I saw this reader comment on Dani Rodik’s blog and I think it perfectly captures the essence of the arguments against the unjust Balyoz trials going on against the Turkish Military. Thanks to Ugur Soylu.
–ccc
>>>
by Ugur Soylu Diyor – 08 Ocak 2013 09:22
I invite everybody to forget about; the fabricated documents, the power of the Gulen Movement and its followers, has there really been an attempt for a coup?, have these army officials been involved in these kind of actions?, Turkish Military had done it before so why not now?, etc…. Forget about all this. In any country, any prosecuter can bring about charges against anybody for anything. The difference is that in a country that has the real Justice with due process, presumption of innocence (innocence until proven guilty), shady evidence against the defendant works in favor of the defendant, and etc., this is what would have been happened: After the first hearing, in light of all the facts of the evidence being shady, the judge would have dismissed the case and told the prosecutor to come back with unquestionable evidence and ask for another trial. To me the questions below are vital: 1. Are these trials just? 2. Could the prosecuters have gone this far with these allegations in any other country that has real Justice or could these trials would have been dismissed as soon as it was revealed that the evidents the prosecuters brought about were shady. 3. In no democratic country with civilized society today, nobody in law practice or interested in law practices and/or press/media would say this: “Yes there are big discrepencies within the allegations, yes there are due process problems, yes some evidences are shady, yes the defendants were not given the right to defend themselves propoerly, yes they should have not been kept in jail for all these years with this kind of long trial process without judgement, yes I feel for the defendants, yes, yes, yes, yes BUT you can’t say nothing happened”. If there are people in a country who say all these things but still trying to justify these allegations and trials, nobody could say there is LAW in that country. 4. The last and the most important thing is that; could this have happened in any other country with a modernized society living under law that is just for everybody and anybody? And if it did would we have seen millions of people marching on the streets for due process and justice because of the shady evidence. The real problem is the society in Turkey. Turkish society in general believes in democracy, liberty, law, human rights, democratic rights and scuh only if it works in their favor. Most of them have no social awareness, no social reactions unless it’s against them. There is a real authoritarian regime in Turkey with few rights given to its citizens and that government still can go out and say that there is not even Democracy but Advanced Democracy in their country and they can have the support and the votes of the 50 percent of the voting population. The governments in Turkey has never, is not and never will want to educate its citizens in light of democracy, personal liberties, law, etc. because in that case, they would never be able to run the authoritarian regime that’s in their favor. So the real problem for me is that; If the citizens of a country do not realy know what democary, personal liberties, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, law, justice mean they will not care about any of these trials and keep believing – blindfolded- the goverments that they’ve voted for.